While the technology may be an improvement in safety the government has no business mandating it. They are not authorized to do so by the Constitution. However, most if not all bureaucracies ignore the law and just post regulations anyway. There is the added attraction of regulations imposed that will favor a certain company while barring others. This usually involves payoffs, tips or bribes. Like helmets, seatbelts, safety glass and airbags are/were good safety ideas that were forced on the public "for our own good." The most glaring have been DRL and airbags. Air bags were a "passive restraint" that worked in ONE TYPE of collision: straight ahead. Shoulder belts and lap belts were good in all crashes but people just would not put 'em on so they passed a law "for our own good." Daytime running lights were becoming popular in Kansas when I was commuting to school in the early 60's. Kansas, the home of half-blind farmers who would stop on a highway, their pickup doors inches apart to discuss whatever farmers discus, totally blocking the road! Kansas, the home of the single white light in the center of the grille to warn oncoming drivers there was a vehicle ahead. This idea was inspiration to GM to develop a diode circuit for the headlights so they would be about 60% of full voltage brilliance and be on anytime the ignition was on or after engine start. GM was, I suspect, instrumental in legislation to make this mandatory. This produced another phenomenon of people driving around in the dark with no tail lights!
Now we have a situation where riders by and large think ABS on two wheels is a good idea and manufacturers are starting to put them on their machines. That is the way things are supposed to work. So why are some outfits sending ABS bikes everywhere but HERE?! Is it a set-up to make it a law so legislators get more lobby money? So manufacturers can get more money per model? I would not doubt it but I'M a cynic.