Who gives a rat's ass? It sure shouldn't be a national headline and in every news report.
We have bigger fish to fry!
Maybe all Kymcos are drive by fags! ??? ::) ;D ;D ;)
View Poll Results: where do you stand on gay/lesbians getting married :I didn,t do the math but I anticapate the same here. I am curious about global vs. US results.
yes, they should have the same rights as anyone else 5 /20.83%
no, marriage should be a man and woman only 12 /50.00%
not a federal issue...each state should decide for themselves 2 /8.33%
all governments..(state and federal) should stay out of it..its none of their business anyway 3/ 12.50%
i dont care.. 2 /8.33%
This is the results so far in the auto forum.
Who gives a rat's ass? It sure shouldn't be a national headline and in every news report.
We have bigger fish to fry!
"This issue isn't about the government forcing a church to marry gay couples (seriously, where did that notion come from?)"
Catholic school. Maybe they did more damage than I thought!
Luckiest are the Muslim gays! They can have more than one guy!!! ;D ;D ;D;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D
They can do what they want, but when they tape a video called "redhead visitor pt. 2" they just ask to get mocked. :D
Can't be, I'm heterosexual, not homosexual, (fag or gay), I can't speak for the rest of you though! LOL!
The other forum is a car forum, made up mostly of American's, and mostly older then 40 so that may have something to do with the results.
You obviously enjoyed Pt1 so much that you just had to see pt2? Lol :D
For some crazy reason, pt. one is nowere to be found ???
You mean you actually searched everywhere for part 1? ;D
You'll be surprised!...
(http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/2012/05/best-funny-photos-56.jpg?w=500&h=669)
...ummm..think he did...lol..
:-*
I love the crap out of you guys! But not in a gay marriage kinda way.
I thought Axy was a bit tooooooo Axy! I WAS surprised!
No. they shouldn't.
To keep this breif:
America will finally fail if this comes to pass.
America used to be the shining light, the promised land, now we're no different than Rome, when rome was the Roman Empire.
Chinese dynasty's fell for the same type of lewed behavior.
Looks like men won't ever learn.
Fags!
...Z!!!!...
...you taking this laying down??
..or just on all 4's.....
??? :o ???
...somebody gonna start a riot!!
"http://www.gay.com"
Should homosexuals be allowed to Marry in the traditional sense, have leagl union of some sort or no option like that at all?
It's a big time debate here in the States these days, how about where you are?
(http://thedooryard.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341caaa953ef011571a33186970b-pi)
I think all people should have the same rights no matter race, religion, national origin or sexual preference. Come on people, this is 2012 not 1800! Seriously...
That being said, I have an answer to all of this. Ban marriage by any government! Keep it, gay or straight, as domestic partnership. Like it has been pointed out here, marriage is between two people and their preacher, and the state should have nothing to do with it! If a church is okay with same sex marriage, go for it! If they aren't, while I'd consider them closed minded, more power to them, then don't.
Legally, however, in a free society, all people should have the same rights, so if marriage is currently a legal institution it should be allowed no matter who you are! Seriously, gay people have the same right as I do to cut that alimony check every month! Grrrrrr!
Odd thing is that in 1800 it was modern times then too, so you can't look at it as if it were a poor time for thinking. Some of the greatest minds came out of the 1800's.
Ask yourself one question, why was everyone so against homosexuals getting married?
Marrige was intended so that heterosexuals would precreate and raise a family to increase the population and homosexuals with unnatural sex acts cannot do that.
If you want to give homosexuals a contract fine but to me "marrige" is something special that hetero sexuals have between themselves. Let homosexuals come up with something of their own. Same rights as heterosexuals but not called marrige.
I think that humans can procreate and start a family just fine without "marriage". In fact, I see no reason why rational, non-religious people would enter "marriage", except because of the usual "everybody does that" passed on by the "elders" and peer pressure.
........."History repeats itself".................
...thats an awesome arrangement of dots displayed there, batman...
;)
Odd thing is that in 1800 it was modern times then too, so you can't look at it as if it were a poor time for thinking. Some of the greatest minds came out of the 1800's.
Ask yourself one question, why was everyone so against homosexuals getting married?
Marrige was intended so that heterosexuals would precreate and raise a family to increase the population and homosexuals with unnatural sex acts cannot do that.
If you want to give homosexuals a contract fine but to me "marrige" is something special that hetero sexuals have between themselves. Let homosexuals come up with something of their own. Same rights as heterosexuals but not called marrige.
Something 10% of the population takes part in is not "normal".
And you have yet to show me where homosexuals ever got "married" in the past.
This subject goes very deep, the US has been watered down greatly over the past several decades. We lower our standards to get accepted into college and med school, we lower the test score needed to become a sgt. or other "rank" on our police force and fire dept's., everyone gets a trophy and everything is wonderful.
We have stopped striving for excellence, our test scores are an abomination when compared with other world class countries and it was all by design. The drug culture that was ushered in during the 60's and 70's, feminism of the 70's helped break down the family unit (I'm not against women's rights), allowing subpar members of society to gain lic. as doctors, capt's on police forces ect only contributes to the eroding society we have, adding homosexual behavior to that list only drives us down another notch.
This post will provoke some comebacks in this forum I’m sure, don’t take offense and have an open mind.
Actually marriage was not solely created for procreation. Procreation could take place without marriage. It was a way to tell society that you have a mate and that therefore it was acceptable to have sex with them (as often as you'd like) without having a woman branded as a prostitute, or essentially as 'loose'. It also meant that the parents would take responsibility for the off-spring's upbringing, who would in turn care for their elders.
It was also a safety net for women. If a woman was unmarried she did not have anyone to protect her from other men (other than her family). Depending on how far back one goes in history women did not have many rights or opportunities to work, own property and make money. Often men and women did not marry for love, but as a mutual partnership. The man provided a home, shelter and protection. A woman cared for the home, made the meals, and yes, sex was a great benefit too.
As society progressed marriage was recognized as both a legal and a religious entity. However, history has also shown that men often took on several wives both in Eastern and Western cultures. Evidence of this can be found in the bible (Old testament), and the Mormon religion did once allow polygamy. To say that marriage was created to be between a man and a woman is far from the truth. Marriage as a tradition has been greatly changed and amended over the centuries. Look at the Church of England's break from the Roman Catholic Church that brought on the age of Reformation. The ability to divorce was at the center of that conflict (among others).
I believe people are against gay marriage not because they believe that the 'Word' marriage should be only reserved for a legal/religious ceremony between a man and a woman. I think it's because they are against the ideas of gays or lesbians being accepted in society, to be treated normally with the same rights and privileges as everyone else. For someone who is religious this also serves as a threat to the infallible credibility of the bible (or other religious source) much like the Theory of Evolution is thought to do, or the revelation that the Earth is not flat, the sun does not revolve around the earth, or that our world is over 4 billion years old. Some people have a hard time accepting that.
Years ago I don't think anyone saw this issue coming, and it seems many people have been knocked off balance by the idea. From the beginning of mankind homosexuality has existed. In most cultures it has been on the fringes of society, with gays and lesbians marginalized to even their demise sought (the Holocaust). However, if you look past whatever preconceived notion or unchallenged assumption one has about gays and lesbians you find they are, at the heart of things. just people, fighting to be treated fair and equally.
Their struggle is no different than those of woman and minorities for most of the 20th Century. To grant them the same rights as married couples but to call it something else is to treat them as 2nd class citizens. It would be apartheid on the grounds of marriage rather than race.
-Wolf
Something 10% of the population takes part in is not "normal".
And you have yet to show me where homosexuals ever got "married" in the past.
This subject goes very deep, the US has been watered down greatly over the past several decades. We lower our standards to get accepted into college and med school, we lower the test score needed to become a sgt. or other "rank" on our police force and fire dept's., everyone gets a trophy and everything is wonderful.
We have stopped striving for excellence, our test scores are an abomination when compared with other world class countries and it was all by design. The drug culture that was ushered in during the 60's and 70's, feminism of the 70's helped break down the family unit (I'm not against women's rights), allowing subpar members of society to gain lic. as doctors, capt's on police forces ect only contributes to the eroding society we have, adding homosexual behavior to that list only drives us down another notch.
This post will provoke some comebacks in this forum I’m sure, don’t take offense and have an open mind.
I now pronounce you man and man.
You may kiss the homo.
I now pronounce you man and man.
You may kiss the homo.
Should homosexuals be allowed to Marry in the traditional sense, have leagl union of some sort or no option like that at all?
It's a big time debate here in the States these days, how about where you are?
and have an open mind.
One thing that strikes me is that it is the conservatives, those who think government should be small and interfere as little as possible in citizen's lives, those who scream "freedom" and "liberty" so much that the words have lost their meaning, who want to deny rights to people.
Mark and Brian (local d.j.'s) put it well when we had the whole prop 8 debates here in California. Thowe who support the right to same sex marriage are either gay or lesbian or they are confident in their sexuality. Those who oppose same sex marriage are bigots.
Those who oppose same sex marriage are bigots.
I really see two distinct "types" of gay people. There are those that are born Trans Gender, (born with the body of A, and the physiology of B) and those that choose to be gay. For the first group I truly empathize with the dilemma they have been dealt. For the second group I have no love/pity/empathy. Those that choose a life style, and complain about it can go suck a log.
That being said... If you are in the first group, and "gay" is the word to describe your life then I support the marriage. If you are a flamer that just likes preening, and drama... suck the afore said log. Marriage is not for you. It is for people that know who/what they are.
You can pick your friends, and you can pick your nose, but you can't pick your friends nose.
It's not normal.
I'm sorry, but you really think people choose to be gay? That of all of the things a person can choose to do, they would pick the one thing that would make them a social outcast and a target of ridicule (much like you expressed) and violence? Doesn't make any sense. Your description of a gay person as a flamer/drama queen sounds like a stereotype. What is this based off of? How many gay people do you actually know and have you expressed this idea with them?
Are you also saying that heterosexuality is a life-style choice as well? If so does that mean that you could choice to be gay if you one day got bored of women?
-Wolf
Okay, if I have in front of me a piece of chocolate cake and a piece of strawberry cake, I have to make a choice because I want them both. If there is a good looking woman and a good looking man in front of me, both willing to have sex with me, it will be the woman. I do not have to choose, as I am not sexually attracted to men!
Anyone
What I mean is the type you described as being attention seekers due to inferiority issues is exactly what I meant. Just like the white kids acting like ethnic hood rats. Those are the ones. They choose their own "hardship", and lead the parade.
They are most of the reason this is even an issue. It never would have bothered me until it became political. Then I knew what ever party it is that doesn't approve of creating laws to allow/deny "Gay Marriage" is the one I agree with. (on this topic alone) And if laws need to be made to allow it... I vote to Not allow the making of those laws. It's more of a political statement on my behalf. If some group that never had my attention wishes to refer back to that time... All they have to do is whatever it was before they drew my attention to the subject.
If that sounds in any way Bigoted I apologize for real. I never knew. It doesn't ring of bigot to me.
I think some others agree a stand has to be taken to preserve what we have, and let things work them selves out within that. More "Red Tape" isn't the cure. It only opens other doors. What "New Church" is going to apply for animal marital rights... The two are not intended to compare only to point out the path. Crumbling foundation...
Just everyone go about your business, and every thing will be fine. Otherwise "Arm the Scooters Boys!" (I'll probably just ride this one solo...)
Maybe the issue can be shifted to a different perspective, not on whether to allow or not same sex marriages but on their legal status after they get married. You know, legal rights, civil status, inheritance, etc. I think this is more of the issue to gays rather than the "marrying" part.
I can shorten it more...
Law is an applied discipline, while morality, being philosophical, is not an applied discipline. The two will never mix.
Last I knew, morals related to right or wrong behavior. So MORALLY, murder, theft, robbery, rape, pedophilia, etc, are all wrong. That's why there are laws. So you see, there's nothing confusing about applying good morals to law.
Applying a law to the length of skirt, as you say, has nothing to do with morals for the common good. That's a personal standard. Personal standards are better policed in school and Amish societies, not in public! ;D
The word morals can be a matter of interpretation, but if you look at its exact definition it applies perfectly to law. The trouble with morals is when you enter this gray area where the public is mixed on what is right or wrong. That's why this discussion is so popular. It's a good, healthy debate, though!
Who dictates what is right and what is wrong behavior? Huh? There are some parts of the world where rape is not immoral! did you know that? Rape is a requisite for marriage! See? for you rape is immoral... for them it's not. And they have no law that rape is unlawful. Pedophilia? Yes! immoral to me but in other countries, children marry older men. That is their culture! Immoral? The law states that 18 years old is the adult age. An 18 year old work, buy and alcoholic drinks, etc.!!! Yes? Right? Hey man, this is an American Law! Wake up.!!! I am not an American and I don't give a sh**! Just open minded..... Btw, the length of skirt example was just an example in a Philosophical perspective....
The word morals can be a matter of interpretation, but if you look at its exact definition it applies perfectly to law.
Sir, can you give me the EXACT.... I mean.... EXACT.... definition of the word Morals????? I'm excited to know!!!! because not even the greatest Philosophers can give the exact definition of morals....
I still dont quite get, why anyone would want to get married in a religion, which sais that you should be killed with stones.
And another thing, I don't lke to be touched.
And I don't like anybody touching any of my stuff.
So if any of you homos touch me, or any of my stuff, I'll kill ya.
And another thing, I don't lke to be touched.
And I don't like anybody touching any of my stuff.
So if any of you homos touch me, or any of my stuff, I'll kill ya.
Hey 008! We need a new topic! This one is wore out...
That one sucks... It's not philosophical. We all feel for them, and hope it works out. My money is already there.Well want do you want for nothin', Rubber Biscut?
Condoms! Our government is passing a bill about family planning which includes among others, giving out free condoms, and the Catholic Church is against this because to them the government is encouraging pre-marital sex by giving free condoms.
As a teenager, I LOVED pre-marital sex! :D :D :D
Damn, here we go again!!!!
But you all are missing the point, the gov. wants tax payers to pay for someone's recreational activity in the formof condoms. Well then they should pay for my recreational activities too, I want gas for my boat. By the way the tank holds 58 gals. and it's time for a fill up. What's fair is fair.
But you all are missing the point, the gov. wants tax payers to pay for someone's recreational activity in the formof condoms. Well then they should pay for my recreational activities too, I want gas for my boat. By the way the tank holds 58 gals. and it's time for a fill up. What's fair is fair.
Feminine lesbians: The only gay thing allowed in my bedroom.
+1
Everyone in my country can get free condoms. We have family planning centres all over that give them out to anyone who want them, even comes in a neat little bag with a tube of lube inc too, just in case your foreplay abilities are limited to taking off your socks. You dont even need an appointment or have to speak to anyone, just walk in, take a bag and walk out. To me thats a good thing, cuts unwanted pregnacies, cuts std's, and encourages safe sex. Sure my tax money pays for it, fine, no problem with that, tax money also pays for people to get treatment for std's, healthcare for pregnant females and abortions for unwanted pregnancies too so it kinda bamances itself out.
While i can see how having a 12 yr old come home with condoms may seems a bit frightening, research shows that the younger you teach kids about sex and pregnancy then the better choices those kids will make when they do eventually have sex. My daughter is 9 and they already get taught basic reproduction etc, by 12 they will have been taught all about sex here. Its impossible today to keep things from kids anyway, the internet has opened up a wealth of knowledge for teens. Questions you or i where maybe too scared or embarrassed to ask as a 13 yr old can be answered with a quick google.
Education works way better than that silver ring thing type program you guys had in the states, you know that one that taught abstinence etc? It didnt work. Didnt work in Africa either. Condoms save lives, and stop lives being ruined by disease, and stop kids having kids, but only if you teach them how to use them properly and to be responsibe.
Education is exactly the point and key to all this. however we all know that education starts and stops in the home. School should be a support or backup. I'll be the one teach my daughter what is right and wrong and how to best protect herself against std's and becoming a mother.
Me boating also prevents women from getting prego, I can't screw and drive my boat at the same time, I want free gas, hell a fre boat too.
And no, your not getting any free gas.
I'm a lesbian.
I read this last night, but was too tired to type, "Ewww!" :D
This may work for those that still have young kids. If it's not too late.
I told my daughter one rule. Before doing anything... assume Daddy will find out, and just ask yourself one question before doing... Will Daddy be PROUD!
She still loves me, and is raising her kids with the same one rule.
Yes, there is a horrible hidden agenda! God forbid, our government is trying to reduce teen pregnancy and the spread of s.t.d.'s. How dare they!I fully understand your point but tell me, with all the "education" and preventive measures taken by the worlds gov's has the problem gotten better or worse?
Yes, there is a horrible hidden agenda! God forbid, our government is trying to reduce teen pregnancy and the spread of s.t.d.'s. How dare they!
A few (okay, maybe quite a few) scams make the news because they are the exception, not the rule. Hence the term "news." If a story came out every time the government spent a fair price on something, everyone would get bored and there wouldn't be much room for anything else in the paper.
Just because they spent a lot on noodles once and the military spent a bunch of money on tools and toilet seats 30 years ago (yes, I remember it well...the early 80's and I was in the Navy) doesn't mean everything they do is corrupt...come on.
Maybe your government is straighter than ours!!! ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D Here corruption in government is not news or unusual! it's a culture!
Vivo, do you have proof that the government is buying 100 dollar condoms? Seriously?
As far as the problem getting worse, I don't buy it. It is talked about more, yes. However we don't have the 13-17 year old girls suddenly disappearing from school (some getting married) like we had in the 70's. More public participation is a good thing, but just because something is discussed more often doesn't mean it is happening more often. We have a much lower murder rate than we've had since the 70's (at least here in the U.S.) but you hear about murders much more in the news. Same goes for drunk driving and, I argue, teen pregnancy.
I love anti-government speak. It's usually supported with no solid information and is backed up by hearsay and confrontational attitude.
The government in the USA is purchased by lobby groups with real funding. Extreme and unchecked expenditures for defense are often supported by anti-government whiners while spending for support of education/medicine/infrastructure dismissed as waste. I'm really amused by those who think no government oversight is a good thing. We're in the midst of a humongous economic problem created by financial institutions that skirted existing rules and gambled with OUR money and were bailed out with OUR money and have not supported US. The greed is good orthodoxy starting with Ronny is so out of control and for some inexplicable reason people have come to expect large businesses to be more efficient than government. I've never seen any large group of people run an entity efficiently. Our government is more-or-less open and no business tells us about their waste.
End of screed.
Right, the government told the banks to take on bad loans. That really makes sense...
Follow the money. Who specifically in government made billions of dollars on the overextension of loans? Who makes money from lack of oversight? Who is/was offering loans that it knew it couldn't back? Governments, of course, not banks and financial institutions.
Who's still gambling OUR money on bad "investments", government, of course. It's all a government conspiracy, right?
Read a real newspaper, listen to (oh no) NPR, read a history book.
Communication failure here. I think we're talking past each other a bit. I hold private industrial banking greed responsible for most of the present financial mess we're living through. Since the '80's we've been deregulating the banking industry, allowing them to lower the hurdle to lending. We've allowed them to get into more and more areas where risk is real. And here's my real rub; The cynical and myopic way that this (and other) industries have managed to get average people to vote against their own good. So many of us complain about the big bad government, while not saying a word about the folks that truly run this government; private industry. Why aren't we paying for elections with tax money? Why do we allow companies to be personages with rights? Why do we even listen to quick/easy solutions to very involved problems ("Just kick the bums out!", "It's all the _______'s (fill in the blank with your favorite group) fault!" Why don't people follow the money? This country is about money, follow it. Who has more money, the banks or groups fighting for the rights of borrowers? Who has more money, Exxon/Mobile or the entire green energy industry? Who has more money to lose by changing the present energy balance (90% oil/coal/natural gas), the oil industry or the climate scientists that have proved several times over that climate change is happening?
End of screed rev 2...
Last message for me.
There was a comma between read and NPR, two different details.
RAPID climate change IS A FACT. Even Chevron now admits. They support a carbon credit tax. Some of us in this country are hold outs that there is no human activity connection. I believe are for a few reasons, primarily because large energy firms have fought it and many of us don't want to believe that we are reason for climate change. Chevron's previous CEO openly states he financed the very small group of outlier climate scientists that saw a buck in being outside the huge majority. It's not that the earth's climate hasn't changed over history, it's that the climate is changing at ~100X faster than any recorded data. The recorded data comes from ice cores and other (I don't recall exactly what: earth excavations?) records.
Thanks for jousting with me. It's been fun and I like people with a sense of accountability and reason.
Enjoy scooting!
Ask the people of Iceland if warming is happening. By 2014 they will have to rename it Rockland. I 100% agree it is sped up expodentially by removein materials from the earth, and replacing them with mud if anything at all. Take any multi viscus item... Drain it of its core elements, and replace the elements with mud. FAILURE. That is what WE have done to the Earth. Simple.
The earth quakes mentioned on another thread... Direct consequences of OUR actions. The Earth is crumbling beneath us and some have the BALLS to say it's not us... Go back to High School, and take a few more physics classes.
Still want on an answer as to why those scientist had to forge the results.
Started new topic on Global warming, this will be fun. (watching you guys explain it that is)
A giant friggin' rock from the sky! The Earth then fell into an Ice Age from the soot in the atmosphere. We are on the stabilization side of that last Ice Age. Unfortunately we have run ramp-id for too long, and the next swing is all on us.
I thought that was how we got Dino burgers! I doubt Dino's were roaming the earth 4-5,000 years ago. The Egyptians would have crapped their pants!
This particular city and area around it is a strange mixture of people from surrounding hills (typically considered to be right-wing, religious, backward, not too educated, stubborn) and great people from the city itself, with a tradition of Mediterranean openness, hospitality and intelligence. Roman emperor Diocletian lived there when he retired, for example...
This is a big political issue because we had elections half a year ago and lefties are in power now, so many ministers will join the Pride this year, including the minister of interior affairs.
I love how you use a broad stroke when describing those from the hills as "typically considered to be right-wing, religious, backward, not too educated, stubborn" Is it only those that disagree with you that get labeled this way or is everyone from the hills this way, and how did you verify this? Sounds pretty closed minded to me that one would not consider their views as sincere to them.
And as for the "minister of interior affairs, is that the same as being in the closet? LOL!!!
In countries where there is no dictatorship, "minister of internal affairs" is in fact a chief of police overseeing police force work, an independent figure. I hope you do not live in a dictatorship, or a country where one person is pulling all the strings because they generally do not have that figure in the government.
As for you being worried about anti-homo bigots, the people I am talking about are equal to hillbillies, rednecks or hicks, whatever you call them.
If you want to see pictures of those people attacking Gay Pride people, here are some pictures:
http://www.aktual.hr/Resource/CropAndResize?url=%257e%252fCms_Data%252fContents%252faktual%252fFolders%252fSlike%252fVIJESTI%252fOSTALO%252f%257econtents%252fTBBJWX2TW8A35MDS%252fgaypride-moskva-afp625.jpg&x=0&y=0&width=800&height=506&destWidth=612&destHeight=0 (http://www.aktual.hr/Resource/CropAndResize?url=%257e%252fCms_Data%252fContents%252faktual%252fFolders%252fSlike%252fVIJESTI%252fOSTALO%252f%257econtents%252fTBBJWX2TW8A35MDS%252fgaypride-moskva-afp625.jpg&x=0&y=0&width=800&height=506&destWidth=612&destHeight=0)
http://www.novilist.hr/var/novilist/storage/images/vijesti/hrvatska/bocama-kamenjem-petardama-i-uvredama-na-rivi-docekani-sudionici-gay-pridea/gay-pride-u-splitu-1-foto-ante-cizmic/552713-1-cro-HR/Gay-pride-u-Splitu-1-Foto-Ante-Cizmic_ca_large.jpg (http://www.novilist.hr/var/novilist/storage/images/vijesti/hrvatska/bocama-kamenjem-petardama-i-uvredama-na-rivi-docekani-sudionici-gay-pridea/gay-pride-u-splitu-1-foto-ante-cizmic/552713-1-cro-HR/Gay-pride-u-Splitu-1-Foto-Ante-Cizmic_ca_large.jpg)
http://static.nacional.hr/img/9a2b2f1d0f650d93fdcbc188d464b762_700x550.jpg (http://static.nacional.hr/img/9a2b2f1d0f650d93fdcbc188d464b762_700x550.jpg)
And my favorite: http://www.google.hr/imgres?start=98&hl=hr&client=opera&hs=VZk&sa=X&rls=en&channel=suggest&biw=1647&bih=967&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=VYlyOQhg_o3QXM:&imgrefurl=http://www.balconn.com/site/dnevnik/vijesti-aktivizam/934-i-ovakav-pride-je-pomakao-granice.html&docid=YhvG1pqinPSjmM&imgurl=http://www.balconn.com/site/images/stories/vijesti_aktivizam/split-pride-01.jpg&w=900&h=590&ei=4Q_RT4fvJ-W64AS_mZSMDw&zoom=1 (http://www.google.hr/imgres?start=98&hl=hr&client=opera&hs=VZk&sa=X&rls=en&channel=suggest&biw=1647&bih=967&tbm=isch&prmd=imvns&tbnid=VYlyOQhg_o3QXM:&imgrefurl=http://www.balconn.com/site/dnevnik/vijesti-aktivizam/934-i-ovakav-pride-je-pomakao-granice.html&docid=YhvG1pqinPSjmM&imgurl=http://www.balconn.com/site/images/stories/vijesti_aktivizam/split-pride-01.jpg&w=900&h=590&ei=4Q_RT4fvJ-W64AS_mZSMDw&zoom=1)
These guys are generally just a notch above monkies and they are preparing riots for the Pride next weekend again.
Not all. I said that in that particular city there are some great people who are not these illiterate backward thugs planning to throw Molotov cocktails at gays.
This particular city and area around it is a strange mixture of people from surrounding hills (typically considered to be right-wing, religious, backward, not too educated, stubborn)
Sorry I read this as meaning everyone from the hills are as you described above, not sure how I mistook it.
How do you silence a crying baby fag?
Stick a pacifier up his ass!!!!!!
on topic..